Ending Forced Trans Divorce: Mission 7/8ths Accomplished

[NB This article is the second in a series looking at the ‘unfinished business’ of LGBTI equality in Australia]


It is now 12 months since the passage of legislation that finally allowed lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex people the right to marry under Australian law.


Well, most LGBTI people. Because it did not immediately overrule the laws of some Australian states and territories that prevent people who are married from changing their identity documentation to reflect their gender identity. In effect, making some trans and gender diverse people choose between the recognition of their relationship, and recognition of who they are.


Instead, the Marriage Amendment (Definition and Religious Freedoms) Act 2017 gave states and territories 12 months in which to update relevant legislation to provide married people with the same opportunity to update their birth certificates as unmarried people.


At the end of this 12-month period, on 9 December 2018, the existing exemption under sub-section 40(5) the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 was repealed:


Nothing in Division 2 renders it unlawful to refuse to make, issue or alter an official record of a person’s sex if a law of a State or Territory requires the refusal because the person is married.


So now that this deadline has expired, how did the states and territories respond?


First, there are two jurisdictions that had already abolished forced trans divorce prior to the passage of the Marriage Amendment (Definition and Religious Freedoms) Act:


The Australian Capital Territory, where section 24(1) of the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 1997 does not make any distinction on the basis of whether a person is married or unmarried, and


South Australia, where sub-section 29I(3) of the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 1996 explicitly states that an application to change sex or gender identity ‘may be made under this section even if the person is married.’


There are four other jurisdictions that passed legislation within the 12 month time-frame granted to repeal forced trans divorce:


Victoria, where Parliament approved the Justice Legislation Amendment (Access to Justice) Act 2018 on 22 May. Among other things, this law repealed the requirement in section 30A of the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 1996 that a person be unmarried in order to apply to alter their details on the register, and


New South Wales, which passed the Miscellaneous Amendment (Marriages) Act 2018 in June. Similar to the Victorian Act, this legislation removes the requirement in sub-section 32B(1)(c) of the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 1995 that a person be unmarried in order to apply to alter the register to record change of sex.


Queensland, which also passed its Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Amendment Act 2018 in June, amending the requirement in section 22 of the original Act that a person be unmarried for their sexual reassignment to be noted on the Register, and


The Northern Territory, which passed the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2018 in late November, taking effect on 6 December with only three days to spare.


Which means that, having passed the December 2018 deadline, two out of eight Australian states and territories had failed to repeal forced trans divorce:


Western Australia, where the Gender Reassignment Amendment Bill 2018 passed the Legislative Assembly in November 2018, but was not passed by the Legislative Council before the end of 2018. Update: The Legislative Council passed the Bill on Tuesday 12 February 2019, meaning forced trans divorce has now been abolished in 7 out of 8 Australian jurisdictions, leaving only:


Tasmania, where the Justice and Related Legislation (Marriage Amendments) Bill 2018 – which makes a range of important amendments beyond simply repealing forced trans divorce – passed the Legislative Assembly in November 2018 despite Government opposition, and awaits consideration by their Legislative Council in March this year.


Of course, it is incredibly disappointing that, more than a year since same-sex marriage was legalised, there is still even one jurisdiction where forced trans divorce remains active. That is not genuine marriage equality.


The good news is that the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 now applies to these discriminatory provisions. However, enforcement still relies on individuals making a complaint to the Australian Human Rights Commission, and potentially through the Federal Courts – simply to access a birth certificate that accurately reflects their gender identity. That is unacceptable.


Forced trans divorce won’t finally be made history until the Parliament of Tasmania gets rid of these abhorrent provisions once and for all.




* This article was originally published in June 2018 as ‘Ending Forced Trans Divorce: Mission Half Accomplished’.

3 thoughts on “Ending Forced Trans Divorce: Mission 7/8ths Accomplished

  1. I note that not much is being done about the compulsory requirement of (unfunded by Medicare) genital surgery to have a birth certificate gender descriptor changed. This is not required to have a passport changed.


    • Thanks for your comment Jennifer, and for raising this important issue. It will be the subject of another post in this planned series. On the positive side, the Queensland Government is currently consulting about removing this requirement. The Victorian Government also attempted to remove this requirement earlier this term, but was blocked by the Upper House. Hopefully they are re-elected and able to complete the process next term. And, in NSW, there were at least hopeful comments of possible co-operation on this issue during last week’s parliamentary debate. Although obviously none of this guarantees reform in any of our three biggest jurisdictions.


  2. There was actually no need for all the angst had those elected to Federal Parliament passed appropriate legislation at the time instead of doing a dirty deal with religious objectors in both the LNP and Labor Parties. And sadly the Qld B,D&M Act still discriminates against Trans-people who cannot afford, or have due to medical reasons, GRS to correct their genitals. Indeed the Act enables the legal discrimination of the estimated 70% of trans-people who have not had GRS to continue without abatement.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s